Do you touch my Supabase database or RLS policies?+
No. SiteSpiker optimizes only the delivered frontend — your bundle, render path, assets and caching. Your Postgres schema, row-level-security policies, triggers and edge functions are left exactly as they are.
Will this work with my Next.js App Router setup?+
Yes. We’re server-component and streaming aware, so we optimize both the server-rendered shell and the hydrated islands. Whether you fetch from Supabase in a Server Component or on the client, we tune the critical path around it.
My data lands in ~40ms — why is my app still slow?+
Because the query isn’t the bottleneck. The browser spends seconds parsing a large JS bundle, hydrating components and running sequential auth checks before it ever renders your rows. That gap between data-ready and paint is exactly what we compress.
Can you reduce a 2.8 MB JavaScript bundle safely?+
Yes. Through tree-shaking, route-level code splitting, deferring non-critical modules and trimming duplicate dependencies, a typical Supabase frontend drops toward ~0.9 MB on the initial route — with no behavioral changes and full regression checks.
Does optimizing hydration break realtime subscriptions?+
No. We idle-schedule and defer non-critical realtime setup so channels, presence and subscriptions still connect — just after the first meaningful paint instead of competing with it. Live updates keep working exactly as designed.
What about the auth flash before getSession() resolves?+
We restructure the render so the app shell paints immediately and the authenticated view resolves in place, eliminating the blank-screen or skeleton flash while the Supabase client rehydrates the session token.
Do I have to migrate off Supabase or change frameworks?+
Never. This is delivery optimization, not a rewrite. You stay on Supabase and on your current framework — React, Next.js, Vue or SvelteKit. We change how the frontend is built and served, not what it’s built with.
Can you speed up assets served from Supabase Storage?+
Yes. We tune how storage-hosted images and files are requested and rendered — modern formats, correct sizing, lazy strategy and caching — so those assets stop dominating your LCP element.
How do you measure the before and after?+
We benchmark against Core Web Vitals and lab tools — PageSpeed / Lighthouse, LCP, TTI and shipped-JS weight — on the same routes before and after. You get a concrete report, like PSI 32→90 and LCP 6.6s→1.9s.
How fast can I see results, and what does it cost to start?+
You can start free — run an audit and see your app’s frontend scorecard at no cost. Most Supabase projects see measurable LCP and interactivity gains within the first optimization pass. Create an account to kick it off.